The New York Times is calling on President Biden to initiate a withdrawal.

The editorial board of The New York Times asserted on Friday that US Democrats must confront the reality that President Joe Biden is no longer capable of defeating Donald Trump on Election Day in November. They emphasized the need for the party to identify a stronger candidate to replace him, following what was widely regarded as a disastrous performance by Biden against Trump during a live presidential debate in Atlanta, Georgia. Observers noted Biden's apparent frailty, confusion in speech, and difficulties articulating his positions.

In their published piece, The NYT expressed skepticism about Biden's ability to replicate his 2020 victory over Trump, stating, "That is no longer a sufficient justification for why Mr. Biden should be the Democratic nominee this year." The editorial board argued that Biden appeared on the debate stage as a diminished figure, struggling to present coherent policy positions and failing to effectively counter Trump.

"There are Democratic leaders who are better equipped to offer clear, compelling, and energetic alternatives to a potential second Trump presidency," the board wrote. They cautioned against relying on voters to overlook or dismiss Biden's visible signs of age and declining health.

Consequently, the editorial board concluded that Democrats would have a stronger chance of defeating Trump if they acknowledged Biden's inability to continue his candidacy and established a process to select a more capable replacement.

While not suggesting specific alternatives, various media outlets and commentators have speculated about potential Democratic figures who could step in, including Vice President Kamala Harris, California Governor Gavin Newsom, Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer, and Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker.

Following the debate, Biden himself acknowledged his shortcomings, admitting to supporters in Raleigh, North Carolina, "I know I’m not a young man… I don’t speak as smoothly as I used to. I don’t debate as well as I used to." Nonetheless, he affirmed his commitment to continue campaigning, asserting his qualifications for the presidency based on his ability to deliver results and persevere through challenges.