اردو 
Russia Conducts Hypersonic Missile Strike in Response to Ukrainian Attacks
The strike was launched in response to Kiev’s use of Western-made long-range missiles, the president has said
In New Delhi, India, on June 4th, a significant event unfolded in Mawar village, Kashmir. A gathering of several hundred young men congregated outside a modest two-storey house, set against the backdrop of the majestic Pir Panjal mountains. Among the crowd, the atmosphere was electric as cheers erupted, and emotions ran high. Elevated above the throng, a man was hoisted upon shoulders, his voice ringing out with determination, proclaiming, "Tihar ka jawab" ("the answer to Tihar jail"). In response, the crowd fervently chanted back, "Vote se" ("through the vote"), as women peered through windows and children scrambled up the brick boundary wall to catch a glimpse of the unfolding spectacle.
This jubilant scene marked the celebration of a remarkable victory – that of Abdul Rashid Sheikh, more commonly known as "Engineer Rashid." Despite being incarcerated in Delhi's Tihar jail, located approximately 850 kilometers (528 miles) away, Engineer Rashid emerged triumphant, clinching the Baramulla seat in Kashmir with nearly half a million votes. What made this victory even more astonishing was the fact that Rashid contested and won the election while behind bars, a rare feat in Indian politics.
His win reverberated beyond the confines of Kashmir, resonating with the broader political landscape of India. Rashid's success was a blow to the established political order, as he defeated candidates from two major pro-India political parties in the region – former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah of the National Conference, and Sajjad Gani Lone, a prominent figure in the Jammu and Kashmir People's Conference, who had transitioned from separatism to mainstream politics.
The rarity of an independent candidate prevailing over contenders from established political entities underscored the seismic nature of Rashid's victory. In the sprawling democracy of India, where independent candidates often struggle to make significant inroads, Rashid's triumph stood out as an anomaly. Moreover, his ability to secure victory from the confines of a jail cell added an extra layer of intrigue to his electoral feat.
Rashid's journey to incarceration was laden with controversy and accusations. He was arrested following the Indian government's decision to revoke Kashmir's special status and statehood on August 5, 2019. Charged under the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, Rashid faced allegations of "terror funding" and was accused by India's National Investigation Agency (NIA) of instigating Jammu and Kashmir police personnel against the Indian Army, alongside receiving funds from Pakistan. Despite vehemently denying these charges, Rashid found himself entangled in a legal quagmire, navigating a landscape fraught with political intrigue and legal challenges.
Yet, Rashid's story was not an isolated one. In a parallel narrative unfolding in the northwestern state of Punjab, another incarcerated candidate secured a resounding victory. Amritpal Singh, a 31-year-old advocate for a separate Sikh homeland, emerged triumphant in the Khadoor Sahib constituency, despite being held in a high-security prison in Assam, thousands of kilometers away. Singh's electoral success mirrored Rashid's in its defiance of conventional political norms and its ability to resonate with the electorate despite the candidate's physical absence from the campaign trail.
The victories of Rashid and Singh served as a poignant message to the mainstream political establishment in India, signaling a shift in the political landscape and a reconfiguration of traditional power dynamics. Analysts interpreted these wins as indicative of a growing disillusionment with mainstream political parties, particularly in regions marked by simmering discontent and longstanding grievances against the ruling government led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
The significance of Rashid's win extended beyond mere electoral arithmetic; it symbolized a broader sentiment of defiance and resilience among marginalized communities. For Rashid's supporters, his triumph represented a form of resistance against perceived injustices and a means of asserting their agency in the face of adversity. The rallying cry of "Tihar ka jawab" embodied a spirit of defiance, a refusal to be silenced or marginalized by the forces of authority.
In the aftermath of Rashid's victory, his supporters and sympathizers mobilized, galvanized by a sense of solidarity and a shared belief in the power of democratic expression. Rashid's sons, Abrar and Asrar Rashid, emerged as vocal advocates for their father's cause, urging voters to turn out in droves to deliver a resounding verdict against injustice. Their impassioned pleas struck a chord with the electorate, particularly the youth in northern Kashmir, a demographic often disenfranchised and disenchanted with the political establishment.
Abrar Rashid articulated the significance of his father's win, emphasizing its broader implications for the marginalized and the disenfranchised. In his view, Rashid's victory transcended individual ambitions; it represented a beacon of hope for those unjustly incarcerated and a testament to the enduring spirit of resistance in the face of adversity.
Yet, Rashid's electoral triumph was not without controversy or dissenting voices. Critics questioned the implications of electing a candidate embroiled in legal controversies and accused Rashid of exploiting populist rhetoric to advance his political agenda. However, for his supporters, Rashid's victory was a validation of their faith in his leadership and a vindication of their steadfast loyalty in the face of adversity.
The resonance of Rashid's victory extended beyond the confines of Kashmir, reverberating across the political landscape of India and beyond. It served as a stark reminder of the enduring power of democratic expression and the indomitable spirit of resilience in the face of adversity. Rashid's win was not merely a triumph for a singular individual; it was a victory for the principles of democracy and the collective aspirations of a marginalized community striving for justice and empowerment.
